Liberalism has never been about establishing a universal standard. Liberalism is simply intellectual cover for those wanting to gain political power and increase the size of the state.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Liberalism isn't change. It has to be imposed.
Liberalism can only be defined negatively. It is a mere critique, not a living idea.
Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face.
My objection to Liberalism is this that it is the introduction into the practical business of life of the highest kind namely, politics of philosophical ideas instead of political principles.
Liberalism is an attitude rather than a set of dogmas - an attitude that insists upon questioning all plausible and self-evident propositions, seeking not to reject them but to find out what evidence there is to support them rather than their possible alternatives.
If liberalism is to mean anything at all, it is duty bound to support without hesitation the dissenting individual over the group, the heretic over the orthodox, innovation over stagnation, and free speech over offense.
Liberalism is a religion. Its tenets cannot be proved, its capacity for waste and destruction demonstrated. But it affords a feeling of spiritual rectitude at little or no cost.
I used to have a phrase: Liberalism is spreading misery equally. And now the ruling class throughout Washington seems to have adopted this.
Liberalism is a most important by-product of Rationalism, and its origins and ideology must be clearly shown.
Discoveries made during the last hundred years have shown that liberalism is the best system to improve a country's well being.
No opposing quotes found.