Besides black art, there is only automation and mechanization.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Well, in any art there are a lot of technical things that you can get to like.
There are art forms we don't know about yet that will be enabled by technology we haven't invented yet.
All art is but imitation of nature.
In a sufficiently prosperous society where people specialize sufficiently, and where enough of the crappy work is done by machines, all work becomes art.
As a child I was very into gadgets and machines and robots. The idea of experimenting with machines to create art was always something I tinkered with.
In its most limited sense, modern, art would seem to concern itself only with the technical innovations of the period.
We've lost these qualities, these abilities to do something by hand. Some illustrators have it still, but it's just not art. We have photography. We have cameras and computers that do it better and faster.
Mechanization best serves mediocrity.
I mean, certainly writing, painting, photography, dance, architecture, there is an aspect of almost every art form that is useful and that merges into film in some way.
In art there are only fast or slow developments. Essentially it is a matter of evolution, not revolution.