I really did try to write it so that an educated public that cares about issues like this doesn't have to be a lawyer and can read it and understand it.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think people are confusing the right to write with the right to be published.
I'm not an angry person. When I write, the lawyer in me tries to make it as easy to read as possible.
If you desire information on some point of law, you are not likely to ponder over the ponderous tomes of legal writers in order to obtain the knowledge you seek, by your own unaided efforts.
Writing, I'm convinced, should be a subversive activity - frowned on by the authorities - and not one cooed over and praised beyond common sense by some teacher.
I was brought up to try to see what was wrong and right it. Since I am a writer, writing is how I right it.
Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.
I don't think you can write according to a set of rules and laws; every writer is so different.
Let those who will - write the nation's laws - if I can write its textbooks.
If you write a written book, you're gonna get slowed up by lawyers wanting to see what you say about this person, that person - I couldn't be bothered with it.
You must write for children in the same way as you do for adults, only better.