Quote

Nanotechnology is an idea that most people simply didn't believe.

The real problem with natural selection is that it makes no intuitive sense. It is like quantum physics; we may intellectually grasp it, but it will never feel right to us.

The lessons learned as we try to build ever more sophisticated nanomachines will almost certainly inform our understanding of the origins of life.

Precisely because intelligent design does not turn the study of biological origins into a Bible-science controversy, intelligent design is a position around which Christians of all stripes can unite.

I don't want to be too harsh, but there's very little evidence for 'intelligent design' or any sort of creator.

Natural selection is not gene centrist and nor is biology all about genes; our comprehending minds are a result of our fast evolving culture.

Intelligent design, unlike creationism, is a science in its own right and can stand on its own feet.

'Intelligent Design,' the relabeled, repackaged form of American creationism, has always had a problem. It just can't seem to produce any evidence.

I had been impressed by the fact that biological systems were based on molecular machines and that we were learning to design and build these sorts of things.

Natural selection is not evolution.