As a world view, Darwinism cannot of course be refuted, since Faith is, always has been, and always will be, stronger than facts.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
There is no refutation of Darwinian evolution in existence. If a refutation ever were to come about, it would come from a scientist, and not an idiot.
Whether or not evolution is compatible with faith, science and religion represent two extremely different worldviews, which, if they coexist at all, do so most uncomfortably.
Darwinism is not merely a support for naturalistic philosophy: it is a product of naturalistic philosophy.
Evolution is a bankrupt speculative philosophy, not a scientific fact.
Of course, there is no reconciliation between the theory of evolution by natural selection and the traditional religious view of the origin of the human mind.
You have to know evolution to understand the natural world. And that cannot be a threat to people of faith. There's a serious problem if you are forced by your faith to reject the most well-supported theory in all of science.
Creationist critics often charge that evolution cannot be tested, and therefore cannot be viewed as a properly scientific subject at all. This claim is rhetorical nonsense.
If you take Darwin's theory and extend it to its logical end, it can be used to justify a number of very horrendous things.
Evolution and creationism both require faith. It's just a matter of where you choose to place that faith.
Evolution is a bankrupt speculative philosophy, not a scientific fact. Only a spiritually bankrupt society could ever believe it. Only atheists could accept this Satanic theory.