A moment's reflection shows that Liberalism is entirely negative. It is not a formative force, but always and only a disintegrating force.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Liberalism can only be defined negatively. It is a mere critique, not a living idea.
The liberal left can be as rigid and destructive as any force in American life.
Liberalism is a religion. Its tenets cannot be proved, its capacity for waste and destruction demonstrated. But it affords a feeling of spiritual rectitude at little or no cost.
Liberalism is Rationalism in politics.
Liberalism is an attitude rather than a set of dogmas - an attitude that insists upon questioning all plausible and self-evident propositions, seeking not to reject them but to find out what evidence there is to support them rather than their possible alternatives.
My objection to Liberalism is this that it is the introduction into the practical business of life of the highest kind namely, politics of philosophical ideas instead of political principles.
Liberalism is assisting quality of life, whatever you may choose.
Liberalism isn't change. It has to be imposed.
If liberalism is to mean anything at all, it is duty bound to support without hesitation the dissenting individual over the group, the heretic over the orthodox, innovation over stagnation, and free speech over offense.
Liberalism is a really old British tradition and it has a completely different attitude towards the individual and the relationship between the individual and the state than the collectivist response of Labour, and particularly Old Labour, does.
No opposing quotes found.