Don't forget your great guns, which are the most respectable arguments of the rights of kings.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
We are a great enough country to respect the Second Amendment rights of lawful gun owners and protect our children. And those things don't need to be in conflict.
As far as military necessity will permit, religiously respect the constitutional rights of all.
My tastes are not those of the king, who has none, except for hunting and mechanic's labour.
Some might consider me an unlikely advocate for gun rights because I sustained terrible injuries in a violent shooting. But I'm a patriot, and I believe the right to bear arms is a definitive part of our American heritage.
If the king refuses the constitution, I shall oppose him; if he accepts it, I shall defend him; and the day on which he gave himself up as my prisoner secured me more fully to his service than if he had promised me half his kingdom.
The right to bear arms is because it's the last form of defense against tyranny.
The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed.
When it comes to our children, the most precious treasure God ever gives us, we protect them with a little sign that says, 'No guns allowed.'
Kings will be tyrants from policy, when subjects are rebels from principle.
The right to bear arms? What about the right to live?