I am for a clear distinction between public and private life. I believe private matters should be regulated in private and I have asked those close to me to respect this.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
While I accept that there are certain things about my private life that will always be of interest to the public, it would be better if you give the same amount of attention to issues that matter as well.
The only time the private parts of someone's life are relevant is when they're affecting public performance. And just because someone is a public person doesn't mean that any part of his or her private life is open to scrutiny. If someone is doing his or her job, you have to have enough empathy to understand that we all have personal problems.
I am a public person and I have my private life. It's important for me that my private life stay private, that what I share with the people is my public personality.
May we agree that private life is irrelevant? Multiple, mixed, ambiguous at best - out of it we try to fashion the crystal clear, the singular, the absolute, and that is what is relevant; that is what matters.
I don't think you have the right to shout about other people's private life.
Obviously you try to keep as much of your private life as private as you can.
I'm private in the sense that I like my personal space and only want people in the parts of my business that I choose to share. Anything I feel is too personal to share publicly, I keep to myself.
Legally speaking, there are no such things as 'public rights,' as distinguished from individual rights. Legally speaking, there is no such creature or thing as 'the public.'
The more aspects of life that can be moved from private reign to public realm, the better it is for politics.
Nothing in human life is inherently private.