I've always had the impression that real militants are like cleaning women, doing a thankless, daily but necessary job.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The majority of them give the impression of being men who have been drafted into the job during a period of martial law and are only waiting for the end of the emergency to get back to a really congenial occupation such as slum demolition or debt collecting.
And while national military forces have historically resisted the full participation of women soldiers, female talent has found plenty of scope in revolutionary and terrorist groups around the planet.
In reality, the pioneers of this transformation of the indigenous Zapatista woman are a merit of the women insurgents.
In the 360-degree battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan, women have served honorably and fought valiantly. Yet there is a key difference between being in harm's way and reacting to enemy contact, and being in a direct combat operations role day in and day out. They are different scenarios that require different standards.
The brave and capable women who served in Iraq and Afghanistan have performed admirably.
A true woman always loves a real soldier.
These days, it's often women in uniform - moms, wives, even grandmothers - who deploy and leave their families behind.
We know with certainty that the Obama administration has re-defined 'militants' to include any military-age males they kill regardless of whether they were actually doing anything wrong. We know with certainty that the U.S. Government has detained and publicly branded as 'terrorists' people they knew at the time were innocent.
If there is an exotic woman it's always a terrorist role.
In my experience of the men of action I have met - whether from the Second World War or Iraq or Vietnam - they often had to do things that they would rather not reflect upon afterwards. This is perhaps one reason why the story of the Bielskis remained untold for so long.
No opposing quotes found.