I like to believe, as a writer, that anybody who isn't a reader yet has just not found the right book.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I was aware that there is an expectation that writers inevitably falter at this stage, that they fail to live up to the promise of their first successful book, that the next book never pleases the way the prior one did. It simply increased my sense of being challenged.
I read just endlessly, ceaselessly, almost every book, it seems!
My perfect reader doesn't just read - he or she devours books.
At least for me, writing a book is continual exposure to blind spots. There were things I wanted to be true and wanted to believe, but it always got more complicated in the fiction.
I am a big believer in the fact that all authors really write only one book.
Every reader re-creates a novel - in their own imagination, anyway. It's only entirely the writer's when nobody else has read it.
I don't know who said that novelists read the novels of others only to figure out how they are written. I believe it's true. We aren't satisfied with the secrets exposed on the surface of the page: we turn the book around to find the seams.
When you get inside a literary novel you feel that the author, more often than not, just doesn't know enough about things. They haven't been around enough - novelists never go anywhere. Once I discovered true books about real things - books like 'How To Run a Company' - I stopped reading novels.
A book is a journey: It's a thing you agree to go on with somebody, and I think every reader's experience of a book is going to be different.
As a reader, I much prefer to read a book where people embody all kinds of ideas and everybody is making mistakes.