Contemporary fiction is the hardest for me because I am not really in the popular culture - I don't watch TV.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Fiction is harder for me than nonfiction - more gratifying, as a result, when it succeeds.
But I don't read a lot of fiction. I prefer the nonfiction stuff.
I write contemporary fiction, and that is what my readers want to read.
I don't read a great deal of fiction, to my shame, other than the classics.
Fiction, even when it's grim and hard, is fun.
It's hard to do fiction and nonfiction simultaneously.
I read little nonfiction, but I have no boundaries about the fiction I relish. The only unfailing criterion is that I can hitch my heart to the imagined world and read on.
I'm always interested in contemporary fiction.
While I love to read contemporary fiction, I'm not drawn to writing it. Perhaps it's because the former journalist in me is too inhibited by the press of reality; when I think about writing of my own time I always think about nonfiction narratives. Or perhaps it's just that I find the present too confounding.
Obviously, I love to do both contemporary and historical fiction. When a hint of a story grabs me, I try to go with it to see where it will take me whatever the setting.
No opposing quotes found.