We still lack a global definition of terrorism.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The global response to global terrorism must not endanger fundamental human rights and freedoms.
Global terrorism is extreme both in its lack of realistic goals and in its cynical exploitation of the vulnerability of complex systems.
Terrorism takes us back to ages we thought were long gone if we allow it a free hand to corrupt democratic societies and destroy the basic rules of international life.
The country was not focused on terrorism before September 11th.
It would be easy to define terrorism as attacks against human rights and international humanitarian law forbids attacks against innocent non-combatants which is often the definition used for terrorism.
Terrorism has become the systematic weapon of a war that knows no borders or seldom has a face.
Global terror does not respect national boundaries.
If we continue to create a world where there is poverty and disrespect, there will continue to be terrorism.
I think that in our society we use the word 'terrorism' a lot - individuals throw the word around a lot without carefully considering it.
Terrorism has no nationality or religion.