The violent radicals do not legitimately represent the overwhelming majority of the world's Muslims.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I tend not to believe radical Muslim movements.
The Muslim population in India is, largely speaking, not radicalised. From the beginning, they were always very secular-minded.
They are scared that the BBC or CNN may call them radicals, so they remain soft instead. The problem lies there, with the Muslim leaders, not the Muslim masses.
Fanaticism and terrorism have no place in Islam.
Our work in Britain suggests that radicalization is driven by an ideology which claims that Muslims around the world are being oppressed and - and this is the key bit of the argument - which then legitimizes violence in their supposed defense.
Of course, the overwhelming majority of Muslims are not terrorists or sympathetic to terrorists. Equating all Muslims with terrorism is stupid and wrong.
There are too many people sympathetic to radical Islam. We should be looking at them more carefully and finding out how we can infiltrate them.
Whatever the reason, American Muslims appear far less inclined to support the global jihad than their European counterparts.
It's patently impossible for a Muslim character to represent 'all Muslims.'
You are right, but the weakness does not come from the millions of Muslims in the world. They do not mind being radical, they have no fear to speak out and to protest and to jihad.