If you're not in the hands of an expert editor, you really can go wrong in a lot of different ways.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
A good editor understands what you're talking and writing about and doesn't meddle too much.
Truth is, every writer has to be a good editor, and you have to edit yourself. It's a skill every writer has to acquire.
One should fight like the devil the temptation to think well of editors. They are all, without exception - at least some of the time, incompetent or crazy.
Writers have to put up with this editor thing; it is ageless and eternal and wrong.
And in Hollywood, you know, everyone is an expert. Most of them are expert editors. They can't direct, they can't write, they can't act, but, by God, they all think they can edit.
I believe every editor should stand to edit. That's just my particular soapbox. Some things are so delicate and depend on such fine, delicate work. One frame in one direction or another can make such a difference and it is, in that, like brain surgery.
If every editor turns you down, maybe you should take a second look at your text, however, just in case.
Being an editor doesn't make you a better writer - or vice versa. The worst thing any editor can do is be in competition with his writer.
I have great editors, and I always have. Somehow, great editors ask the right questions or pose things to you that get you to write better. It's a dance between you, your characters, and your editor.
There are two kinds of editors, those who correct your copy and those who say it's wonderful.