In my time as Archbishop of Canterbury I've seen a growing sense of unity and mission.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I have, alas, only one illusion left, and that is the Archbishop of Canterbury.
My visit this autumn is an opportunity to continue that rich tradition of visits between Canterbury and Rome.
If people want a sense of purpose they should get it from their archbishop. They should certainly not get it from their politicians.
What I think is that we in the church - and especially I as an Archbishop - I'm responsible for maintaining our rules, and making sure we hold to unity in the Body of Christ.
England is so defined, the class system, your education. I think what was unique about the Canterbury scene.
I suppose I'm a cultural Anglican, and I see evensong in a country church through much the same eyes as I see a village cricket match on the village green. I have a certain love for it.
Over the years, I have studied church history as well as the contemporary church, and I noticed how rare it is for a God-glorifying transition of leadership to take place in a local church.
I esteem it the crowning mercy of my life that not only the chief ends I contemplated on becoming a missionary are attained, but I am allowed to see competent, faithful, and affectionate successors actively engaged in the work.
I think our failure in the production of good town churches of distinctive character must have struck you often, as it has me, when contrasted with our comparative success in country churches.
I am surprised that I cannot recall whether my desire to become a minister transformed itself into a wish to lead the more militant life of missionary, by a slow process or suddenly.
No opposing quotes found.