See that's a goal that I think it's very good in the debate to find out who the person is.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I want to challenge people to find out who they are.
We all have our own ideas of who we are that may or may not be justified, and you can really find out a heck of a lot more accurately from the people around an individual.
I think everyone is trying to figure out who they are and their own thing.
Whenever I write a part, I think there's this person somewhere in the world that this part is specifically for, and all I have to do is go searching to find that particular individual.
A person is a person because he recognizes others as persons.
He who frames the question wins the debate.
You learn more about a person from the people around that person than you do from the person themselves. We all have our own ideas of who we are that may or may not be justified, and you can really find out a heck of a lot more accurately from the people around an individual.
I don't judge people by their sexual orientation or the color of their skin, so I find it really hard to identify someone by saying that they're a gay person or a black person or a Jewish person.
It's a moral absolute: If you are going to make a human being, you have a fundamental responsibility to that person - to honestly disclose exactly who they are and where they come from.
Know people for who they are rather than for what they are.
No opposing quotes found.