History shows that people often do cast their votes for amorphous reasons-the most powerful among them being the need for change. Just ask Bill Clinton.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I always vote for the guy I think can get it done. And it ain't nobody's business who I vote for, but I voted for Clinton twice. And that just blows people's minds when they hear that.
Bill Clinton strikes me as the kind of guy who goes wherever the polls lead him, rather than leading the polls.
Voting is fundamental in our democracy. It has yielded enormous returns.
I think you have to ask yourself does voting work on the level that you are trying to effectuate change; that is the conversation you must have.
The vote is a trust more delicate than any other, for it involves not just the interests of the voter, but his life, honor and future as well.
I would never say somebody had to vote for anybody. That would be terrible. I haven't said that.
If you look back through history in the United States, there have been very few landslide elections. Half the country always voted for someone else.
A vote should be generative, not like business as usual, which is what voting feels like for most of us.
George W. Bush broke a mold four years ago: Even though he lost the popular vote, he governed as if he had won by acclamation.
Voting is like alchemy - taking an abstract value and breathing life into it.
No opposing quotes found.