Censorship ends in logical completeness when nobody is allowed to read any books except the books that nobody reads.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Censorship is a strange situation. There was times when people would burn books because they didn't like what people were doing.
The prime goal of censorship is to promote ignorance, whether it is done via lying and bowdlerized school texts or by attacking individual books.
Censorship is the thing that stops you doing what you want to do, and what writers want to talk about is what they do, not what stops them doing it.
Literature should not be suppressed merely because it offends the moral code of the censor.
I have a very specific definition of censorship. Censorship must be done by the government or it's not censorship.
Censorship is never over for those who have experienced it. It is a brand on the imagination that affects the individual who has suffered it, forever.
I know that many writers have had to write under censorship and yet produced good novels; for instance, Cervantes wrote Don Quixote under Catholic censorship.
If we ever head down the American path of banning certain books or turning the editorial process into one of censorship, we will risk turning teens off books and sending them elsewhere - to their X-Boxes, for instance. To the Internet. And they won't ever come back to books.
I don't believe in censorship in any form.
I don't for one second think about the possibility of censorship when I am writing a new book. I know I am a person who cares about kids and who cares about truth and I am guided by my own instincts, and trust them.