Political chaos is connected with the decay of language... one can probably bring about some improvement by starting at the verbal end.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think we're still in a muddle with our language, because once you get words and a spoken language it gets harder to communicate.
In general, I agree with Jacob Grimm and feel that we ought to permit changes and uncontrolled growth in language. Even though that also allows potentially threatening new words to develop, language needs the chance to constantly renew itself.
There are times when the power of language is not the power that is needed.
Language is a living thing. We can feel it changing. Parts of it become old: they drop off and are forgotten. New pieces bud out, spread into leaves, and become big branches, proliferating.
Language is an intrinsic part of who we are and what has, for good or evil, happened to us.
Language changes very fast.
It is still not enough for language to have clarity and content... it must also have a goal and an imperative. Otherwise from language we descend to chatter, from chatter to babble and from babble to confusion.
Languages are something of a mess. They evolve over centuries through an unplanned, democratic process that leaves them teeming with irregularities, quirks, and words like 'knight.'
Language is a weapon of politicians, but language is a weapon in much of human affairs.
On the other hand, in a society whose communication component is becoming more prominent day by day, both as a reality and as an issue, it is clear that language assumes a new importance.
No opposing quotes found.