The mind of a human being is formed only of comparisons made in order to examine analogies, and therefore cannot precede the existence of memory.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Memory depends very much on the perspicuity, regularity, and order of our thoughts. Many complain of the want of memory, when the defect is in the judgment; and others, by grasping at all, retain nothing.
I think that I cannot immediately see the route by which we should really understand memory and the workings of the brain.
I have an unusual type of thinking. I have no visual memory whatsoever. Everything is conceptual to me.
As the heat of the coal differs from the coal itself, so do memory, perception, judgment, emotion, and will, differ from the brain which is the instrument of thought.
Our study showed that the false memory and the genuine memory are based on very similar, almost identical, brain mechanisms. It is difficult for the false memory bearer to distinguish between them.
Human memory is short and terribly fickle.
Memory narrativises itself.
Many think of memory as rote learning, a linear stuffing of the brain with facts, where understanding is irrelevant. When you teach it properly, with imagination and association, understanding becomes a part of it.
There is no reality of consciousness independent of the effects of various vehicles of content on subsequent action (and hence, of course, on memory).
The mind is always present. You just don't see it.
No opposing quotes found.