Computer photography won't be photography as we know it. I think photography will always be chemical.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Nowadays shots are created in post-production, on computers. It's not really photography.
Photography can be a volatile situation. It can be very potent.
Photography is the simplest thing in the world, but it is incredibly complicated to make it really work.
I'm staying with film, and with silver prints, and no Photoshop. That's the way I learned photography: You make your picture in the camera. Now, so much is made in the computer... I'm not anti-digital; I just think, for me, film works better.
With light field technology, there is a huge opportunity for creativity in photography that hasn't been available in the past.
Digital imaging is as much about chemistry as it is about semiconductors.
Photography is very presumptuous. Photographers are always photographing other people's lives - something they know nothing about - and drawing great inferences into it.
What makes photography a strange invention is that its primary raw materials are light and time.
I always saw photography as a way to get to film.
You had to be aware that I saw that photography was a mere episode in the history of the optical projection and when the chemicals ended, meaning the picture was fixed by chemicals, we were in a new era.