A society that thinks the choice between ways of living is just a choice between equally eligible 'lifestyles' turns universities into academic cafeterias offering junk food for the mind.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
No one should ever be forced to choose between food and education, or medicine and shelter when they don't have the resources. It's very unfair.
If you are going to be serving a living thing, you have to honor that living thing with some kind of care and thought and preparation to rationalize the taking of that life in some way. Where if you're just grinding up hamburger at McDonald's, I see that as a bit of an affront to living things.
College students want good eats. They want it to not be super-expensive, but you've got to be eclectic, you've got to have style, and you've got to make real food.
In every aspect of life, including the economic dimension, we are always challenged to do the right thing. In many cases in the market system, which allows a great deal of latitude for human choice, people can get carried away to excess.
A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmental damaging consumption patterns.
We struggle with eating healthily, obesity, and access to good nutrition for everyone. But we have a great opportunity to get on the right side of this battle by beginning to think differently about the way that we eat and the way that we approach food.
One should eat to live, not live to eat.
The choicest pleasures of life lie within the ring of moderation.
A lifestyle is what you pay for; a life is what pays you.
Society is composed of two great classes those who have more dinners than appetite, and those who have more appetite than dinners.