I definitely was attracted to similar things in punk and science. They both depend on a healthy dose of skepticism.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Ideologically, the pursuit of science is not that different from the ideology that goes into punk rock. The idea of challenging authority is consistent with what I have been taught as a scientist.
When I was a teenager, science meshed with my developing ideals - such as the challenge to authority that was central to punk rock. In science, anyone from any walk of life could make a discovery that would overturn prevailing hypotheses. And that was a cause for celebration among scientists.
Questioning anything and everything, to me, is punk rock.
Science is very vibrant. There are always new observations to be found. And it's all in the interest in challenging the authority that came before you. That's consistent with the punk rock ethos that suggests that you should not take what people say at face value.
I'm a sci-fi fan, but a lot of the sci-fi you're getting is the same. It's very stereotypical.
Science is the first expression of punk, because it doesn't advance without challenging authority. It doesn't make progress without tearing down what was there before and building upon the structure.
I'm comfortable reading science and dissecting it and discerning the difference between junk science and real science.
Punk is just like any other sub culture or music. Straight rock music has those elements. I grew up in a place where the punk rock kids fed the homeless in the town square.
I formed a band when I was about 13, and we all listened to punk - or what we thought was punk!
Hip-hop and R&B is mostly what I listen to. I don't have a connection with punk rock - I just never had that experience.