Military intelligence is a contradiction in terms.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Many intelligence reports in war are contradictory; even more are false, and most are uncertain.
They say military have the so-called 'secret intelligence' - this amount of intelligence must be very secret, since I've never seen any intelligent military person, nor I have seen any sense in the bloody stupid wars.
For some, the very act of intelligence gathering seems illegitimate when applied to the crime of terrorism.
I think that, in the end, the military behavior and intelligence services are not very different from each other. It's an attitude of hunters; they're observing the prey.
The basic problems facing the world today are not susceptible to a military solution.
Military confrontation is not a suitable alternative in confronting terror and current security threats.
Military investigations are designed not to find anyone guilty.
The president says, 'What difference does it make what you call the enemy?' Are you kidding me? As an intelligence officer, I would never get away with that. I could never say, 'Well, you know, boss, I don't label this enemy that we're facing.'
It is impossible to underrate human intelligence - beginning with one's own.
How can faceless bureaucrats in an intelligence agency deny brave soldiers a chance to tell the truth?
No opposing quotes found.