I don't see a difference between the big screen and the small one. We are entertainers, and the medium doesn't matter.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
You could have the biggest screen, you could have the clearest screen. But if there is not great content on this thing, that big-screen TV is not a huge value to you, even though it has the best picture on the planet.
Though television is a smaller medium than the stage, you can't be afraid to be big.
I'm kind of intimidated by the big screen - I often keep my performances much smaller and much more natural and subtle.
I am a giant proponent of giant screens. But I accept the fact that most of my movies are going to be seen on phones.
I always direct next to the camera and watch my actors, and so you can see the small things that you can't see on the small screen but you can definitely see on the big screen.
If there's something decent going in television, the mediums now are kind of equal. Television has become much higher quality.
If you really love films, and you really want to get the full impact, there's a huge difference between watching something on a small screen with a mediocre sound system and watching it on a giant screen in a giant theater with a huge beautiful sound system. I mean, the difference is electric.
Television is a medium because anything well done is rare.
There are certain films you want to see on the big screen.
Most actors are small, anyway - at least compared to me.
No opposing quotes found.