Social history might be defined negatively as the history of a people with the politics left out.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The truth is that all civic and social change is friction. Politics is friction. The only way you can bend the arc of history is to create that kind of friction, which is something that makes most people incredibly uncomfortable but which, for whatever reason, because of my upbringing or because of my genetics, is something that doesn't bug me.
History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people.
Good history is a question of survival. Without any past, we will deprive ourselves of the defining impression of our being.
History is present in all my novels. And whether I am directly talking about the sociological moment or just immersing my character in the environment, I am very aware of it.
What we normally define as history doesn't interest me. It's a constraint.
Negative politics have always been around.
Without an understanding of history, we are politically, culturally and socially impoverished. If we sacrifice history to economic pressures or to budget cuts, we will lose a part of who we are.
History is formed by the people, those who have power and those without power. Each one of us makes history.
History is an account, mostly false, of events, mostly unimportant, which are brought about by rulers, mostly knaves, and soldiers, mostly fools.
History is little more than the register of the crimes, follies, and misfortunes of mankind.
No opposing quotes found.