And when it is done, we ought to follow the example by disarming ourselves.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If the opposition disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves.
It is always disarming to treat with the enemy, so to speak.
In the first place I remark that no human law is perfect in its construction or execution.
If we fight our enemy using the same inhumane and morally bankrupt techniques that we are trying to stop, we will simply become what we have beheld.
Everyone is bound to bear patiently the results of his own example.
With few exceptions, one ought always do what one is afraid of.
When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred.
If you disarm someone's hands - they cannot kill you!
When it is not in our power to follow what is true, we ought to follow what is most probable.
We are not for disarming people. When you have an epidemic it's a public health issue, a safety issue.