The critics tend to forget their own answers after a while.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The lot of critics is to be remembered by what they failed to understand.
Critics have their purposes, and they're supposed to do what they do, but sometimes they get a little carried away with what they think someone should have done, rather than concerning themselves with what they did.
It's those damn critics again.
So I haven't thought about the critics for a long time.
Have you ever noticed how most critics disagree with the public? That should tell you a lot about critics.
A lot of critics are lazy. They don't want to look closely and analyze something for what it is. They take a quick first impression and then rush to compare it to something they've seen before.
I think critics are very useful. But I think that they, in a way, betray their position when they stop people looking for themselves.
Don't pay any attention to the critics - don't even ignore them.
I don't think the audience always listens to the critics. That's been proven time and time again.
It seems this is an age of clever critics who keep bewailing the fact that there are no works worthy of criticism.
No opposing quotes found.