Some programming languages manage to absorb change, but withstand progress.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
In the practical world of computing, it is rather uncommon that a program, once it performs correctly and satisfactorily, remains unchanged forever.
However, when Java is promoted as the sole programming language, its flaws and limitations become serious.
I find languages that support just one programming paradigm constraining.
The kind of programming that C provides will probably remain similar absolutely or slowly decline in usage, but relatively, JavaScript or its variants, or XML, will continue to become more central.
From the viewpoint of what you can do, therefore, languages do differ - but the differences are limited. For example, Python and Ruby provide almost the same power to the programmer.
A programming language is low level when its programs require attention to the irrelevant.
One of the biggest problems that software developers face is that technology changes rapidly. It is very hard to stay current.
I felt there was a need for us to build a new programming language. I also had come to see that Microsoft functions best when it controls its own destiny.
Software is like entropy. It is difficult to grasp, weighs nothing, and obeys the second law of thermodynamics; i.e. it always increases.
Language changes very fast.