A law can be both economic folly and constitutional.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Just because a couple people on the Supreme Court declare something to be 'constitutional' does not make it so.
Law not served by power is an illusion; but power not ruled by law is a menace which our nuclear age cannot afford.
There is a higher law than the Constitution.
Just because a majority of the Supreme Court declares something to be 'constitutional' does not make it so.
Legislation has been and is still directed towards the protection of wealth, rather than towards the far more important interests of labor on which everything of value to mankind depends.
But there is a higher law than the Constitution, which regulates our authority over the domain, and devotes it to the same noble purposes.
Collecting more taxes than is absolutely necessary is legalized robbery.
Either the law exists, or it does not.
A law is not a law without coercion behind it.
Legislation can neither be wise nor just which seeks the welfare of a single interest at the expense and to the injury of many and varied interests.