If the people should elect, they will never fail to prefer some man of distinguished character, or services; some man, if he might so speak of continental reputation.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Do we elect a man because of what he stands for, because of where he stands on the issues, because how he makes the nation feel?
I want to emphasize that character in our leaders does matter.
You can't exactly bake a man to your specifications. Most of all, one shouldn't alienate a candidate. A hybrid of Einstein, Tarzan and Inge Meysel doesn't exist. Besides, the images of politicians in the media aren't always accurate. I've had my share of experiences in that regard.
We need an honest politician in charge who doesn't care whether they are re-elected and is prepared to make the unpopular decisions.
You often see politicians who try to put on a different persona; they think they should be more jolly or serious. Invariably, the persona they choose is worse than their own.
An unvirtuous citizenry tend to elect representatives who will pander to their covetous lustings.
A good man, though he will value his own countrymen, yet will think as highly of the worthy men of every nation under the sun.
The public character of every public servant is legitimate subject of discussion, and his fitness or unfitness for office may be fairly canvassed by any person.
The choice could not be more clear. Americans can elect someone who literally personifies the failed establishment in Washington, D.C., or we can choose a leader who will fight every day to Make America Great Again.
It is not in the nature of politics that the best men should be elected. The best men do not want to govern their fellowmen.