Yes, politics IS war without bloodshed; and war is an extension of those politics.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
War is the continuation of politics by other means.
War is not an independent phenomenon, but the continuation of politics by different means.
War is not merely a political act but a real political instrument, a continuation of political intercourse, a carrying out of the same by other means.
Politics is the womb in which war develops.
Politics is almost as exciting as war, and quite as dangerous. In war you can only be killed once, but in politics many times.
War is an arena for the display of courage and virtue. Or war is politics by other means. War is a quasi-mystical experience where you get in touch with the real. There are millions of narratives we impose to try to make sense of war.
War is not, in itself, a condition so much as the symptom of a condition - that of international anarchy.
War is, in fact, an extension of politics, and in any war, military operations have to be conducted in such a way that they contribute to sustainable political outcomes consistent with vital interests that are at stake in that war.
In my view of the present aspect of affairs, there is no need of bloodshed and war. There is no necessity for it. I am not in favor of such a course, and I may say in advance, there will be no blood shed unless it be forced upon the government. The government will not use force unless force is used against it.
Politics and war are remarkably similar situations.
No opposing quotes found.