It wasn't a new idea. During the war against the French we had this kind of broadcast for the French soldiers.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
This programme would only really make sense and work properly if it was also broadcast on France's international television channel TV5. So I ended up with a double production, on France 2 and TV5.
Because the GIs were sent massively to South Vietnam, maybe it's a good idea to have a broadcast for them.
What's happened to broadcasting is that broadcasting really used to be... it used to have a very clear public service quotient. And it's more or less now. And it's been lost.
Well, we think the broadcasts did have some effect, because we see the antiwar movement in the U.S. building up, growing and so we think that our broadcast is a support to this antiwar movement.
The electronic media introduced this idea to the larger audience very, very quickly. We spent years and years and years meeting with activists all over Europe to lay the groundwork for a political response, as we did here.
I was for many years myself a journalist and it is not appropriate to say a programme should not be broadcast.
If it's not American, the French won't go see it.
Every time a new technology comes along, we feel we're about to break through to a place where we will not be able to recover. The advent of broadcast radio confused people. It delighted people, of course, but it also changed the world.
The idea of a news broadcast once was to find someone with information and broadcast it. The idea now is to find someone with ignorance and spread it around.
There would probably be less of a frenzy among the French public.
No opposing quotes found.