Men make history and not the other way around. In periods where there is no leadership, society stands still. Progress occurs when courageous, skillful leaders seize the opportunity to change things for the better.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
There will always be men struggling to change, and there will always be those who are controlled by the past.
Men do not learn much from the lessons of history and that is the most important of all the lessons of history.
I don't agree with all-male leaderships. Men cannot be left to run things on their own. I think it's a thoroughly bad thing to have a men-only leadership.
Leadership consists of picking good men and helping them do their best.
To a person growing up in the power of demography, it was clear that history had to do not with the powerful actions of certain men but with the processes of choice and preference.
Long before history began we men have got together apart from the women and done things. We had time.
History teaches us that men and nations behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives.
Success cannot come from standstill men. Methods change and men must change with them.
To be a leader of men one must turn one's back on men.
It is not history which uses men as a means of achieving - as if it were an individual person - its own ends. History is nothing but the activity of men in pursuit of their ends.