What matters in literature in the end is surely the idiosyncratic, the individual, the flavor or the color of a particular human suffering.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The thematic, psychological, and cultural concerns of a writer are more relevant than whatever literary mode he or she chooses to deal with in any given novel.
I think what matters most in literary work is the context, not the text.
Literature... is the union of suffering with the instinct for form.
Literature at its fullest takes human nature as its theme. That's the kind of writing that interests me.
Literature is the question minus the answer.
The novelist must look on humanity without partiality or prejudice. His sympathy, like that of the historian, must be unbounded, and untainted by sect or party.
The fundamentals for me are character and conflict. I put character first because readers will be indifferent to conflict if they are indifferent to the character who is experiencing it.
Some things in literature are inexplicable.
The very essence of literature is the war between emotion and intellect, between life and death. When literature becomes too intellectual - when it begins to ignore the passions, the emotions - it becomes sterile, silly, and actually without substance.
But you cannot expect every writer to dwell on human suffering. I think my books do deal with grave issues. People who say they are too positive probably haven't read them.
No opposing quotes found.