There is one rule for the industrialist and that is: Make the best quality of goods possible at the lowest cost possible, paying the highest wages possible.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
If an industrialist can sell his products anywhere in India and the world, why should a farmer not be allowed to do so?
One succeeds in obtaining an equivalent production at a lower price by improving the arts, trades and agriculture and by developing the physical and moral qualities of workers, farmers and craftsmen.
That doesn't mean you have to have the lowest costs in the industry to succeed. But you need to make sure the activities and product attributes that increase your costs above the other guy bring in at least that much more in revenue, and hopefully more.
I was obliged to be industrious. Whoever is equally industrious will succeed equally well.
Money is the best rule of commerce.
If you talk to most businessmen, they'll say that what they do is for the public good, but you know they're just greedy, and consumers are just consuming for the sake of their own greed.
The very first step to building wealth is to spend less than you make.
As I see it, if the production of a factory is expanding, and workers are satisfied, it's OK for there to be a disparity. The best paid should be about three times more than the worst paid.
When you build relationships with entrepreneurs, they're not trying to optimize on price.
The guiding principle is not to manufacture the goods everyone needs, rather to earn profits for a few capitalists.