The criterion for free choice can never be an absolute one, but neither is it entirely relative.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The capacity to make free choices is not something we either have entirely or not at all. Rather, choices become freer the more they are the result of our own capacity to reflect on and assess facts and arguments.
Every person has free choice. Free to obey or disobey the Natural Laws. Your choice determines the consequences. Nobody ever did, or ever will, escape the consequences of his choices.
But I don't actually adopt the point of view that our subjective impression of free will, which is a kind of indeterminacy behavior, comes from quantum mechanical indeterminacy.
Absolute liberty is absence of restraint; responsibility is restraint; therefore, the ideally free individual is responsible to himself.
In America, through pressure of conformity, there is freedom of choice, but nothing to choose from.
Freedom is relative.
Freewill means that the Universe never judges, never interferes with your own choices - and sees you as a being of equal creative power.
We have to believe in free-will. We've got no choice.
We must believe in free will, we have no choice.
All is foreseen, but freedom of choice is given.