'Wolf Hall' attempts to duplicate not the historian's chronology but the way memory works: in leaps, loops, flashes.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
There's a preoccupation with memory and the operation of memory and a rather rapacious interest in history.
It is the soothing thing about history that it does repeat itself.
A historian is battling all the time to remember as much as possible.
If history starts as a guest list, it has a tendency to end like the memory of a drunken party: misheard, blurred, fragmentary.
History repeats itself. Historians repeat each other.
I feel slightly uneasy at the way historians are consulted as if history is going to repeat itself. It never does.
I think it took me half a page of 'Wolf Hall' to think: 'This is the novel I should have been writing all along.'
History has repeated itself many times througout the ages.
Often the presence of mind and energy of a person remote from the spotlight decide the course of history for centuries to come.
I think history is collective memories. In writing, I'm using my own memory, and I'm using my collective memory.
No opposing quotes found.