I don't think that strategically it is smart to begin cutting your options when the other side does not move at all.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
In the final analysis, it is your decision to make, but it doesn't move as fast as I'd like it to move.
If you limit your choices only to what seems possible or reasonable, you disconnect yourself from what you truly want, and all that is left is compromise.
You can choose a direction that will take you into something that isn't going to take you where you want to go, or you can choose another direction which is down the right pathway.
I like to break left when people think I'm going to go right.
Regardless of the magnitude of the decision, our brains make it hard for us to keep the perspective we need to make good choices.
I'm not trying to steer people in a direction. I'm just trying to move them. Wherever it takes them, it doesn't matter to me. I just want them to be moved in one way or another, and that's a hard thing to do, I think.
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading.
You have to make one thing a priority and achieve balance that way, rather than trying to do everything all at once.
Everybody just uses the one-move rule without realising when it is too late to actually move and cross over and when it is actually being dangerous.
It's easy to make good decisions when there are no bad options.