I think that you can disagree with people and debate over their positions with issues without engaging in the politics of personal destruction.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I don't feel that an atmosphere of debate and total disagreement and argument is such a bad thing. It makes for a vital and alive field.
You have to be able to interact with people whose politics you disagree with.
We may disagree on some things, but we can do so without being disagreeable.
I enjoy the debate... I haven't met a single person in Congress yet that I dislike. It's not about moderating your views: it's about being able to talk about them and defending them in a way that's uplifting to people.
You can't take people's opinions personally. Usually what people say about it is a reflection of them own issues.
I'm used to politics at an international level: people put together an argument and, even if you vehemently disagree with them, well, you can recognise it's an argument and respond.
If you disagree with me about a position I have taken, or what I've done, tell me, argue with me, debate. Sometimes, right and good are not that clear; at other times, it is only deliberate and respectful debate that leads us to understand what road we should take.
I think it's natural for anyone that participates in a public debate to advocate for the most extreme version that they can, particularly if they believe that government tends to compromise.
Thoughtful people of different political philosophies can disagree, but in a very agreeable manner.
In so much of politics you're not allowed to disagree with what's been agreed.