I agree with President Roosevelt, and generations since, that American seniors deserve better than poverty.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Since Social Security was established by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1935 to ensure economic security for American workers, poverty among American seniors has dramatically declined.
As a result of the current universal benefit, the poverty rate for seniors in America is about 10%. Without the universal benefit, it would be over 50%.
If we didn't have Social Security, our seniors would live mostly in poverty. You'd have another 18 million people in poverty.
Imagine a country where the vast majority of seniors live in poverty, a country where for many there are no golden years, but a time of struggle and dependence. That was the United States before the creation of Social Security, which has proven to be one of the most effective and important government programs in our history.
Our seniors have worked long and hard to better the economy, raise families and serve their communities. They deserve to live independent and active lives in their golden years.
I am a huge admirer of Franklin Roosevelt's, and I believe social security has done untold good in alleviating the once-widespread issue of poverty among the elderly. FDR believed in the greatness and generosity of Americans - but he was also a cold-blooded politician.
Before Social Security existed, about half of America's senior citizens lived in poverty.
In the wealthiest nation on Earth, no one who works a full time job should have to live in poverty. That's a fundamental value proposition, an article of faith in our country that I know an overwhelming majority of Americans agree on.
We are one of the richest countries in the world, and there is absolutely no reason why anyone should have to live in poverty.
Without Social Security, poverty rates for African American seniors would more than double.
No opposing quotes found.