We think that the Kyoto protocol is a necessary document, necessary process. I am convinced that we will agree to disagree about substance.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The seas need their own Kyoto Protocol.
The public is strongly in favor of the Kyoto Protocols, so strongly in favor that a majority of Bush voters thought that he was in favor of it. They are simply unaware.
Whether the process proves to be Kyoto or something else, let's acknowledge the urgency of global warming.
The U.S. withdrawal from the Kyoto protocol endangers the entire process.
I believe that nuclear needs to be a part of the solution if the U.S. really wants to be aggressive about reducing carbon.
To put that into some perspective, when Bill Clinton and Al Gore had first taken the idea of the Kyoto Protocol up to the Congress, the United States Senate voted it down 95 to nothing.
The obvious issue is providing clean drinking water and sanitation to every single human being on earth at the cost of little more than one year of the Kyoto treaty.
Look at Fukushima. Should we or should we not agree with the U.S. government that none of that radioactive energy is making its way here? Hello!
The United States did not sign Kyoto, yet its emissions are not that different from the countries that did sign it.
Kyoto was a flawed process. There isn't one industrialized country around the world that has ratified that treaty, and so that is a non-starter.