You know I was curious - I was interested in all kinds of mystery or deeper meanings in the paintings because I myself have not analyzed why they have turned out like this or like that.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Painting is the passage from the chaos of the emotions to the order of the possible.
I'm sure we don't read old paintings the way they were intended.
The trend in some of the contemporary movements in art, but by no means all, seems to deny this ideal and to me appears to lead to a purely decorative conception of painting.
The earliest paintings I loved were always the most non-referential paintings you can imagine, by painters such as Mondrian. I was thrilled by them because they didn't refer to anything else. They stood alone, and they were just charged magic objects that did not get their strength from being connected to anything else.
Painters aren't expected to paint bleak pictures, are they?
Yes, you know sometimes, we started out thinking out how strange our painting was next to normal painting, which was anything expressionist. You forget that this has been thirty five years now and people don't look at it as if it were some kind of oddity.
So many paintings have hidden meanings or need wall texts, but my work is not in that category.
My early paintings weren't that good - I was very influenced by Francis Bacon. But there was a kind of intensity there. And however influenced they may have been by other people, even my earliest paintings were recognisably my own.
I don't very much enjoy looking at paintings in general. I know too much about them. I take them apart.
My paintings are not about what is seen. They are about what is known forever in the mind.