It is immoral from almost any point of view to refuse to defend yourself and others from very grave and terrible threats, even as there are limits to the means that can be used in such defense.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Proselytizing is only wrong if coercive or deceptive. Coercion, whether violent or not, is immoral, just as deception is immoral.
You do not have the right to take another human's life, unless it's in strict self-defense.
It is unacceptable, it is forbidden, to harm the innocent.
Legitimate use of violence can only be that which is required in self-defense.
I defend peoples' right to do that in a lawful manner, but I have not undertaken that practice myself.
Asking someone else to do something immoral is immoral.
To be forced to defend oneself is an inherently undesirable position to be in. The focus shifts from ideas to the person conveying them.
At what point is someone precluded from availing themselves of the justification of self-defense because of their own poor judgment or bad behavior?
The law is immoral.
The only immorality is not to do what one has to do when one has to do it.