The marketplace can handle this. The laws are there. The courts have shown a consistent ability to find a balance between copyright owners and copyright users.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The rights of copyright holders need to be protected, but some draconian remedies that have been suggested would create more problems than they would solve.
All over the world copyright holders are trying to limit consumers' rights. We cannot have that.
The copyright bargain: a balance between protection for the artist and rights for the consumer.
The problem with copyright enforcement is that when the parameters aren't incredibly well defined, it means big corporations, who have deeper pockets and better lawyers, can bully people.
As we've seen, our constitutional system requires limits on copyright as a way to assure that copyright holders do not too heavily influence the development and distribution of our culture.
It's hard to see how the Copyright Office can rise to the many challenges of the 21st-century work that you do without dramatically more independence and dramatically more flexibility.
I think copyright has its right to exist, absolutely, and I think that it's up to copyright creators to come up with new solutions that deal with the reality of the world we're living in today.
A brainy person does not abuse copyright; instead they respect it and uphold it.
I was an online service provider. It's not my job to police what people are uploading. It's the job of the content owners, and the law is very clear. If you create content, and you want to protect your copyrights, you have to do the work.
I'm not a big believer in our copyright laws; I find them way too restrictive.