I think words come between the spectator and the picture.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I give the spectator the possibility of participating. The audience completes the film by thinking about it; those who watch must not be just consumers ingesting spoon-fed images.
The pictures are created by the listener, with a little help from the broadcaster. The pictures are perfect. If you're showing pictures, different things in that picture can distract from the spoken word.
If words don't have vibration behind them, and a real feeling behind them, then they're just words.
All my life I've looked at words as though I were seeing them for the first time.
In my earlier paintings, I wanted the space between the picture plane and the spectator to be active.
Words are just words.
I think words operate like musical notes that the eyeball hears.
Words aren't very good at describing complicated, strange visual things. You can try, and the reader will have some sort of image in their mind, but words aren't good at that.
Sometimes television can just jump from one bit of plot to the next, and the words fill in the in-between.
Words are but pictures of our thoughts.