I do insist on making what I hope is sense so there's always a coherent narrative or argument that the reader can follow.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
If I've vividly laid out the narrative, the reader will come to his own conclusions.
I think the whole thing is: If it makes sense in your head, the audience will go along with it.
Considerations of plot do a great deal of heavy lifting when it comes to long-form narrative - readers will overlook the most ham-fisted prose if only a writer can make them long to know what happens next.
I think there are narratives going on all the time that we think of as tangential - up until they turn out to be deciding factors in our lives.
I feel that these stories are being written to articulate certain confusions and disappointments, and I do mean to shake up the reader, and I do hope they're on target.
As a writer I've learned certain lessons. One of them is to be careful about how you put a view, and to bear in mind how easily and readily you'll be misinterpreted.
I believe that the writer should tell a story. I believe in plot. I believe in creating characters and suspense.
Fiction is optimistic or unrealistic enough to demand that there should be a meaningful narrative.
I'm not really a good reader. What I mean is, I think I'm not one of those people who can read a story and analyze it just like that.
It has always been something I could do, and it may seem odd that in my case I seem to create an interesting narrative and frustrate the reader's opportunities to follow it at every step.