The art of utterance persuades initially by its music and its rhythm, before semiotic or personal characteristics come into play.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
My training in music and composition then led me to a kind of musical language process in which, for example, the sound of the words I play with has to expose their true meaning against their will so to speak.
I've always felt, even as a songwriter, that the rhythm of speech is in itself a language for me.
An artist must possess Nature. He must identify himself with her rhythm, by efforts that will prepare the mastery which will later enable him to express himself in his own language.
For my part, if I consider poetry as an object, I maintain that it is born of the necessity of adding a vocal sound (speech) to the hammering of the first tribal music.
Language in fiction is made up of equal parts meaning and music. The sentences should have rhythm and cadence, they should engage and delight the inner ear.
The lines of poetry, the period of prose, and even the texts of Scripture most frequently recollected and quoted, are those which are felt to be preeminently musical.
The key to artistry is being able to say stuff the way other people can't.
In music, you feel a connection to the voice and think about the person behind it. In art that's secondary.
One of the things that distinguishes poetry from ordinary speech is that in a very few number of words, poetry captures some kind of deep feeling, and rhythm is the way to get there. Rhythm is the way the poetry carries itself.
A verbal art like poetry is reflective; it stops to think. Music is immediate, it goes on to become.