We are very private, so we decided from early on that we will keep the press and editors and everybody out of our house.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If we could have somehow stayed away from the public and the press, it might have been different, but every private issue seemed to be played out on the front page.
I think as journalists, we have to keep our distance from power.
There is a marvelous peace in not publishing. It's peaceful. Still. Publishing is a terrible invasion of my privacy.
There won't be editors in the future with the Internet world, with citizen reporting. That doesn't scare me.
On the Internet, you think everything is going to be public.
I've chosen not to talk about my really private life to the press - I've never invited a huge amount of attention.
Some things should remain private.
As Americans, we rightfully place tremendous value on having a free and independent press. Our role as journalists is to give voice to the voiceless, and hold our leaders and institutions accountable. But the circle is only completed when that information is consumed by a free-thinking and engaged audience.
We live in a time where the media is a very difficult thing to navigate because it's everywhere, and I tend to want to be a lot more private with my life.
In a world where everyone is a publisher, no one is an editor. And that is the danger that we face today.
No opposing quotes found.