In law a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.
To what extent is any given man morally responsible for any given act? We do not know.
No, moral conscience is one thing, the law is another. We have to hold onto this difference.
If anyone has a conscience it's generally a guilty one.
The right to justice is something that no one can bestow, nor take away, for it is in one's heart.
Any law which violates the inalienable rights of man is essentially unjust and tyrannical; it is not a law at all.
Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.
No one politician should be allowed to judge the guilt, to charge an individual, to judge the guilt of an individual and to execute an individual.
A man is truly ethical only when he obeys the compulsion to help all life which he is able to assist, and shrinks from injuring anything that lives.
When a person is found not guilty, they're found not guilty.